Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Punk Gaming and No More Heroes

No More Heroes has captured its share of analytical attention. Of course, when Suda said that the game was influenced by the surrealist western El Topo, that was like announcing a $2 buffet to construction workers and college students.

Sadly for me, cowzilla3 wrote the article that I have been planning when I first started playing the game back in February, specifically the idea that in NMH, we are not so much playing a character named Travis Touchdown but that we are playing a gamer, all of us who have ever played a game just to kill and level. But since cowzilla and others have well described the irony and critique in NMH, I'll have to comment on something else, which is, I think, the obvious question for any artful creation that flaunts the rules and smashes the plane between the art and the audience: so, now what?

Spoilers ahead . . . .

NMH is a punk game, which is what makes it so interesting. At least, that's what the Grasshopper Manufacture logo suggests. But thanks to the continuous recycling of punk every few years, we may have lost the vitality of what punk is, or at least was. It was not just thrashing but conscious breaking of conventions, of making music what it was . . . rebellious. And NMH is one of the more rebellious games I've seen in a while, an upstart that disregards and even thumbs its nose at all the conventions that the 'stadium' games luxuriate in--the sexy, photo-realistic graphics, the complex stories, the intricate controls and involved gameplay, layers of sound and music, and especially the violent game play and objectives. (Schlaghund argues that parody is not necessarily punk, a point well taken. However, I think we shouldn't be too fastidious about what is and is not punk: Grasshopper's slogan is "let's punk" which he explained in a Gamasutra interview: "What I mean by 'punk' is to destroy existing ideas and create something new, original.")

Games have largely become a host of set of conventions with minor tweaks that are nothing more than the t-shirts of someone else's rule-breaking. Mixing FPS and RPG elements are not the stuff of ground breaking games, truth be told.

The ending, such as it is, for NMH is where it flaunts the rules the most. Not only do the characters start acknowledging that they are in a game, the ending splinters in a way that we don't really know what the story is.

  • When players complete the game, they have their choice of endings. But it's not an either-or selection: you can play an ending and return to play another.
  • One of the endings is another battle with a character from earlier in the game who, in another twist, turns out to be Travis's twin brother (albeit with a completely different accent, which, of course, makes no sense). This only emphasizes how little Travis knows about himself, an absurd parody of the amnesiac protagonist we find in so many games.
  • When the twin-brother battles ends (which it really doesn't, as the characters acknowledge), the scene morphs into a painting which Sylvia and her daughter Jeane are looking at. It is arguable if these are indeed the same characters or if, perhaps, the game has instead been just the imagination of Jeane, as she stared at the painting.
  • Sylvia appears to tell us there will be no sequel, only to be followed by the message "To be continued."
So, just in case you weren't sure of the point of NMH, Suda has beaten you over the head with this ending to clarify: bullocks to your narrative structures. The ending reminds me of when Public Image, LTD appeared on American Bandstand and Johnny Rotten disregarded the lip syncing conventions of the show and just danced with the crowd.

Anyone who makes a game like this deserves accolades because it is an expression of freedom and creative independence. Yet, we have seen this kind of rebellion before. The problem is that we often find ourselves with the equivalent of the Institutional Revolutionary Party: rebelling requires something to rebel against, and if the revolution becomes successful, then it must invent a foil to rebel against further or face the fact that, as the Who sang, "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss." Or it must simply fade away.

Rebelling against conventions for the sake of breaking those conventions only works for so long before we ask, "Now what?" and "So?" In painting and sculpture, we've seen artists rebel against a non-existant conformity after the impressionists, then the expressionists, the cubists, and other -ists make the point that artists don't have to paint cherubs to create something meaningful. Deconstruction is really only interesting and post-modern awareness is clever only for so long.

Even though we should enjoy NMH for what it is and isn't, it's hard not to wonder what Suda's post-punk game will be. These kind of creative efforts are significant because they can be watersheds for even more interesting work, something that might not be obvious to the mainstream until much later. Suda might be working on a game that goes even further in its parody and critique, but is it possible that, in flaunting game conventions, we can look for much different games? Will Suda and his games have that kind of influence? Or is he one of the rare types who can not only critique but can create alternatives, too?

I see NMH mostly as trying to accomplish the first aim for punk games, to destroy existing ideas about what a game is supposed to be. In fact, I think you could argue that NMH doesn't so much destroy those ideas as it has challenges them, maybe even bloodies them. Perhaps I'm being fastidious myself when I say that destroying something is not the same as creating something new. While I appreciate the cleverness and freshness of NMH, it strikes me as a transitional game, one that says, "Games don't have to focus on violence, use levels, have tidy endings, use realistic graphics." If NMH is a critique and rebellion against indulgent, violent and soulless games, then NMH really can't be What Games Can Be. NMH is original, yes, but it is not the real alternative to ladders of murderous gaming that it implies ought to be there.


gnome said...

The proper comment would involve bits of text from the DADA Almanac, but guess it a) wont make much sense to most people b) it will be far too time consuming and still have a bleeding post to end.

Now, back on not properly commenting. I once again have to agree on most points made, though I do believe that most movements criticizing or even trying to smash conventions did actually go beyond critique. It's just that they weren't famous for it, for, let's face it, they didn't manage to crush anything. They were adopted into the system, which when it comes to consumption and art does function like the Borg. It assimilates stuff. Even truly dangerous for its existence stuff.

Seen any Che Guevara tees recently?

Thing is, some things do remain dangerous no matter how you sell them. The Clash might be collectible or retro, for example, but they still inspire. Oh, and breaking conventions and trying to make games that actually matter to an audience outside the average american teen can't be too bad.

Fantastic piece Guttertalk!

guttertalk said...

Thanks, gnome.

Lots of threads to spin out from this kind of topic and discussion. I wholly agree that the art and music worlds have learned well to assimilate the vanguard and the fringe. To be honest, it's difficult to generalize about dangerous and unconventional things, and I too was thinking of the Clash, as well as rap music.

But I think that there is some destructiveness in some of these rebellious movements. It might not be literal, of course, and might be as symbolic as smashing a guitar.

I think punk and its derivatives did help the demise of disco and bloated music, but only once punk caught on as a popular movement itself. It's hard to rewrite the rules from the fringe, which is a concern I have about NMH: will others follow?

I think given Suda's quotes in that Gamasutra piece, he does see a difference between destroying and creating. Sometimes, even if only briefly, something that deconstructs or smashes can itself be the creative force. NMH almost achieves that, standing well on its own. But I'm thinking more and more that it feels more like a transitional piece, and I'm not sure that Killer 7 bucked gaming conventions in the way NMH has. If NMH is a critique of the violence, sex, and achievement dominating games, NMH doesn't really get away from that since, even though in irony and parody, all those things are still part of the game.

BTW, the thing is what do the ubiquitous Che shirts really mean, if anything? When an image, for example, becomes purely decorative, to what extent is the meaning of that image muted?

gnome said...

To be pretty honest, I have absolutely nothing against destructiveness in general. Some things have to be destroyed, I strongly believe. Very literally. aircraft carriers and MTV would be a fine start. Some news channels and some postmodernist pompous artists come to mind too... Only then will new things be allowed to grow...

Then again, NMH -you're right- doesn't really go that deep. It's more light-hearted and all the better for it.

Oh, and I would say that a Che shirt can be anything from a fashionable piece of clothing to a revolutionary act. It all depends. Wearing it while smashing a police car is very different from wearing it to a posh club. Wearing it in Greece now, would be very different from wearing it during the dictatorship...

fatherkrishna said...

Wow! Commenting on this inspired post and not reiterating the rhetoric would seem a tad crass...

To even call up the idylls of punk and translate it to gaming might be a futile gesture...

However, 'No More Heroes', encompassing the tune as well as the confines of it's host, makes it as 'punk' as we could hope to dream of thirty years...

I'd love to say as a punk, anarchist and gamer that i'm rushing out to buy it...

Unfortunately, I'm dwelling in the mainstream and loving killing freedom-fighters in COD4 as we speak...

I fought EA and EA won!


guttertalk said...

I hear you, father. I'll have to look for you online playing CoD4: I've been wanting to jump back into that one.

When it was coming out, I never quite got into punk. I thought their "philosophy" was interesting, but I never subscribed completely to anarchy other than in my filing system. :) I'm actually enjoying the music itself far more now than I did then.

Crytal Dragon said...

Hãy đến với Lâm phong china, chúng tôi chuyên cung cấp dịch vụ vận chuyển hàng trung quốc về việt nam. Đến với chúng tôi thì đảm bảo yêu cầu dịch vụ mua hộ hàng trung quốc hay order hàng taobao giá rẻ của bạn sẽ được chúng tôi đáp ứng đầy đủ và hoàn hảo tuyệt đối. Bởi vì chúng tôi là công ty chuyên cung cấp dịch vụ vận chuyển hàng Trung Quốc hàng đầu tại Việt Nam hiện nay. Khi bạn sử dụng dịch vụ của chúng tôi bạn sẽ được tận hưởng sự phục vụ tuyệt vời theo quy trình mà chúng tôi đã đưa ra. Nếu bạn là người cần dịch vụ đặt hàng taobao giá rẻ, hay nhận mua hàng trên aliexpress hãy sử dụng dịch vụ order hàng Trung Quốc, Nhập hàng Quảng Châu giá rẻ... Đảm bảo chúng tôi sẽ giúp bạn mua được hàng với giá rẻ hơn nếu bạn tự đi mua. Còn chờ gì nữa mà không liên hệ với chúng tôi nếu như bạn có nhu cầu đặt hàng trung quốc giá rẻ, hay cần giải đáp thắc mắc.

Có thể bạn quan tâm đến: Inbox là gì

patsm00re18 said...

Lot of brain exercise gamesfor you, offers it!
Visit us at brain games!

Unknown said...

interesting post. thank you for sharing.